(CNN) -- The "extraordinary" rush to develop an 
Ebola vaccine is moving forward apace, the lead researcher told CNN's 
Christiane Amanpour on Tuesday, adding that the fast pace may engender 
ethical concerns about how it the vaccine is eventually implemented.
"This is, frankly, 
extraordinary," Adrian Hill of the Jenner Institute at Oxford University
 said. "We are trying to do in a few months something that might 
typically take 10 years. We've had accelerated reviews of all our 
applications, regulatory and ethical approvals, and so on."
"And we're now trying to 
proceed so quickly that if things go well, by the end of the year, this 
vaccine might actually be being used in the three affected countries in 
West Africa."
He said that the vaccine 
has been shown to be "really quite remarkably protective" in studies on 
monkeys at the National Institutes of Health in the U.S.Researchers are under 
tremendous pressure to develop a vaccine, as over 3,400 people have died
 in West Africa and a Spanish nurse's assistant was confirmed on Monday 
to be the first person to have contracted the virus outside of Africa.
But even if researchers 
are able to make enough vaccine, and have data showing that it is safe 
for use in humans and produces good immune responses, Hill said that 
they will would not know that "it actually works."
"So we're going to have 
to figure out a way of using the vaccine, and at the same time 
evaluating it. And there's a great deal of discussion about how you 
might do that now."Therein may lie ethical concerns.
There is little worry, he
 said, about administering a vaccine to humans in a phase one trial, as 
he said will begin this week in West Africa. The issue is what you do 
after that.
"Once you've shown 
safety in those individuals, do you go on to deploy the vaccine in a 
very large population -- ideally of health-care workers who are at 
greatest risk -- without knowing that the vaccine actually works?"
"Or instead, do you wait
 several months -- maybe six months, maybe a year -- to prove absolutely
 that the vaccine has a certain efficacy and then start thinking about 
deploying it widely?"
"And if you wait that long, the epidemic might either be over, or the whole thing might be completely out of control."
"So that's the challenge -- to figure out what the best thing to do, given those conflicting priorities as I've described them."
 

 
 
.jpg) 
 
 
